Introduction to Game Theory: a Discovery Approach

Section 4.3 A Class-Wide Experiment

We are going to look at a class-wide game.

Each member of the class secretly chooses a single letter: “C” or “D,” standing for “cooperate” or “defect.” This will be used as your strategy choice in the following game with each of the other players in the class. Here is how it works for each pair of players: if they both cooperate, they get each get 3 points. If they both defect, they each get 1 point. If one cooperates and one defects, the cooperator gets nothing, but the defector gets 5 points. Your one choice of “C” or “D” will be used to play the game with all the other players in the class.

Thus, if everyone chooses “C,” everyone will get 3 points per person (not counting yourself). If everyone chooses “D,” everyone will get 1 point per person (not counting yourself). You can't lose! And of course, anyone chooses “D” will get at least as much as everyone else will. If, for example in a class of 20 poeple, 11 people choose “C” and 9 choose “D,” then the 11 C-ers will get 3 points apiece from the other C-ers (making 30 points), and zero from the D-ers. So C-ers will get 30 points each. The D-ers, by contrast, will pick up 5 points apiece from each of the C-ers, making 55 points, and 1 point from each of the other D-ers, making 8 points, for a grand total of 63 points. No matter what the distribution is, D-ers always do better than C-ers. Of course, the more C-ers there are, the better everyone will do!

By the way, I should make it clear that in making your choice, you should not aim to be the winner, but simply to get as many points for yourself as possible. Thus you should be happier to get 30 points (as a result of saying “C” along with 10 others, even though the 9 D-sayers get more than you) than to get 19 points (by saying “D” along with everybody else, so nobody “beats” you).

Of course, your hope is to be the only defector, thus really cleaning up: with 19 C-ers, you'll get 95 points, and they'll each get 18 times 3, namely 54 points! But why am I doing the multiplication or any of this figuring for you? You've been studying game theory. So have all of you! You are all equally versed in game theory and understand about making rational choices. Therefore, I hardly need to tell you that you are to make what you consider to be your maximally rational choice. In particular, feelings of morality, guilt, apathy, and so on, are to be disregarded. Reasoning alone (of course including reasoning about others' reasoning) should be the basis of your decision.

So all you need to do is make your choice. Write it down.

It is to be understood (it almost goes without saying, but not quite) that you are not to discuss your answer with anyone else from the class. The purpose is to see what people do on their own, in isolation. Along with your answer you should include a short explanation for why you made your particular choice.

Adapted from Douglas Hofstadter, Metamagical Themas, p. 740.

–––––––––––––––––––––

Once everyone in class has made his or her choice, share your answers with the class. Then answer the following questions about the class's responses.

Although we can now see what everyone chose, we might not agree that everyone made the most rational choice. How might perfectly rational players play the game?

The next two exercises look at two more examples of games where players can “Cooperate” or “Defect”. How does changing the payoffs change the players' incentive to cooperate or defect?

Not every game where player's cooperate or defect is a Prisoner's Dilemma, or even a dilemma. You can certainly change the payoffs in the above matrices so that it is very clear what each player should do. But as you've seen with this section's experiment, there is something special about the Prisoner's Dilemma. Everyone does better if they all cooperate, but any one player does better to defect. The next section will look more specifically at what makes a game a Prisoner's Dilemma.